Editor’s Note: This is a guest post from Dr. David Tzall
As a psychologist who has spent years in the trenches working with high-achieving individuals, I’ve noticed a glaring blind spot in the pursuit of peak performance: unprocessed emotional baggage.
We like to think we leave our personal lives at the door when we start our workday. But the brain doesn’t work that way. The neural pathways that fire when we deal with a difficult client are the same ones that fired when we dealt with a difficult parent, a bullying classmate, or a past professional failure.
Unresolved trauma and deep-seated anxiety don’t just make us unhappy; they make us inefficient.
The Cost of “Keeping It Together”
High achievers are often masters of compartmentalization. Compartmentalization means me keep our inner world hidden while we look good from the outside. No one would ever know what is swirling inside of us. This is simply a facade that eats away at us. We lose out on achieving peak performance. We make decisions out of emotional reaction and not out of ones that are in our best interest. The brain and body go into survival mode. In survival mode, the brain prioritizes safety over innovation. You become reactive rather than responsive.
We make fear-based decisions and these types of decisions are limiting as they have a cap. These decisions do not move us forward, and they hold us back, if anything. We take fewer risks, too. We are so afraid of losing something rather than what we could gain, that we almost become paralyzed into doing anything new and significant. Growth comes from conflict, and we start to avoid any level of conflict.
Redefining Resilience
There is a common misconception that resilience is about “toughing it out” or “grinding through the pain.” That isn’t resilience; that is endurance. The problem with endurance is it has a limit. If not careful, it will burn us out as we cannot keep going at the same pace over and over again. True resilience is the ability to process. It is the capacity to sit with discomfort, understand where it comes from, and move through it without letting it control your narrative.
A Challenge to the High Performer
If you are feeling stuck, exhausted, or like you are working harder for less return, I challenge you to stop looking at your spreadsheet and start looking inward.
Consider these questions:
What is the narrative you tell yourself about your capabilities?
What is your relationship with failure and what makes you label it as failure?
Have I really opened up to people when they ask how I am doing and check-in on me?
Therapy is not just for “fixing” what is broken. For the high achiever, therapy is an optimization tool. It is the most significant investment you can make in your ability to lead, inspire, and create.
Plastic surgery is more accessible and more openly discussed than it was even a decade ago. People get rhinoplasties, breast augmentations, facelifts, and a range of minimally invasive procedures without much social stigma attached. For most people who pursue cosmetic procedures, the decision comes from a genuine desire to change something about their appearance, and the result produces measurable satisfaction.
For a smaller group, the picture is more complicated. Body dysmorphic disorder — BDD — is a condition in which a person becomes preoccupied with a perceived flaw in their appearance that others typically can’t see, or see only minimally. The preoccupation drives significant behavioral patterns, including repeatedly seeking cosmetic procedures that never produce lasting relief.
Therapists are frequently asked to help draw the line between a healthy cosmetic decision and one driven by BDD, and that can be hard, because most perceived flaws are subjective to the individual.
What is Body Dysmorphic Disorder?
Body dysmorphic disorder is an obsessive-compulsive related disorder that follows the OCD pattern: intrusive, unwanted thoughts paired with compulsive behaviors designed to relieve the anxiety those thoughts produce. In BDD, the intrusive thoughts center on appearance — a nose that seems too large, skin that seems blemished, a feature that seems asymmetrical — and the compulsive behaviors include mirror-checking, seeking reassurance, camouflaging the perceived flaw, and repeatedly seeking procedures to fix it.
BDD produces a mismatch between the person’s perception of the flaw and what others actually observe. A person with BDD may spend hours examining a feature that their friends, family, and physicians can barely discern. The disorder carries high rates of depression, social withdrawal, and impaired functioning — but cosmetic correction doesn’t resolve it. A procedure that addresses the specific feature of concern typically doesn’t produce relief. The preoccupation either stays on the same feature or shifts to a new one.
How Therapists Assess the Difference
When someone comes to a therapist asking about cosmetic surgery — or a surgeon refers a patient for psychological clearance — the evaluation involves a clinical conversation that explores several dimensions at once.
* The first area therapists explore is the nature of the concern itself. A person who wants a rhinoplasty because they’ve always disliked the profile of their nose and feels the change would make them more comfortable in social situations is describing something different from a person who thinks about their nose for several hours a day, examines it repeatedly in mirrors, and has already had two previous procedures on the same feature without feeling better. The difference isn’t in the feature or the procedure — it’s in the relationship the person has with their appearance and how much of their daily life it consumes.
Therapists also look at motivation and expected outcome. Healthy cosmetic decisions tend to involve realistic expectations — the person wants a specific change and understands that surgery addresses the physical feature without guaranteeing broader life changes. BDD-driven motivation tends to involve the belief that fixing the feature will resolve much larger problems, repair relationships, or produce a sense of self that the preoccupation has been blocking.
Several specific clinical signs point more clearly toward BDD:
Preoccupation That Consumes Significant Time — Thinking about the perceived flaw for an hour or more each day, or finding that thoughts about it intrude regularly into daily functioning.
History of Multiple Procedures Without Relief — Having had previous cosmetic work on the same or similar concerns and finding that the result didn’t produce the expected satisfaction, or quickly shifted focus to a new concern.
Social Avoidance Driven by Appearance — Avoiding social situations, photographs, or public settings specifically because of the perceived flaw.
Mirror Checking or Avoidance — Compulsively checking the feature in mirrors, windows, or phone cameras, or completely avoiding reflective surfaces to prevent distress.
Seeking Reassurance — Repeatedly asking others whether the feature looks the way the person fears, while finding that reassurance provides only brief relief.
Camouflaging Behaviors — Spending significant time covering the perceived flaw with clothing, makeup, or positioning.
The presence of several of these together, particularly alongside high distress and functional impairment, moves the clinical picture toward BDD rather than a straightforward cosmetic preference.
Why the Evaluation Requires Care
The reason this assessment requires clinical skill rather than a simple screening instrument is that the categories genuinely overlap. A person can have realistic concerns about a feature and also have some BDD tendencies. Someone whose appearance concern is rooted in trauma — a scar, a feature that became associated with a painful experience — presents differently from someone whose concern developed without a traceable origin.
Therapists working in this area also recognize that social media has complicated the landscape significantly. Constant exposure to filtered images, face-altering apps, and the ability to see one’s own face from every angle creates appearance concerns in people who wouldn’t have developed them otherwise. Whether a specific concern reflects BDD, a reasonable response to a real cultural environment, or something in between requires context, time, and genuine clinical engagement.
What Happens When BDD Is Present
When a therapist identifies BDD as the driver behind a pursuit of cosmetic surgery, the recommendation is typically to address the BDD before any procedure. Plastic surgery in the context of active BDD almost always fails to produce the relief the person is seeking. In some cases, it worsens the disorder, by confirming the belief that the appearance concern was legitimate and fixable while leaving the underlying pattern untouched.
CBT with a specific focus on exposure and response prevention — the same approach used for OCD — is the most evidence-supported treatment for BDD, alongside work on the core beliefs about self-worth and appearance that sustain the preoccupation. When BDD treatment works, many people find the cosmetic concern either resolves or becomes something they can relate to differently, and the drive toward repeated procedures diminishes significantly.
For people whose body image concerns don’t meet BDD criteria but still create real distress — a category that includes many more people — therapy addresses the relationship with appearance more broadly, building self-concept on a foundation that doesn’t depend on specific features looking a specific way.
Flourish Psychology works with individuals navigating body image concerns, BDD, and the intersection of appearance and self-worth at their Brooklyn Heights office, with online therapy available throughout New York State. To get started, call 917-737-9475 or schedule an appointment online.
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has more research behind it than almost any other mental health treatment approach. The core of it is that our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors all influence each other and changing patterns in one area produces changes in others.
Therapists working from a CBT framework help clients identify thought patterns that create distress, examine whether those patterns are accurate, and develop more functional ways of responding to the situations that trigger them.
How that looks in practice shifts considerably depending on what’s being treated. CBT for depression uses different techniques than CBT for OCD. CBT for trauma is structured differently than CBT for panic disorder. The model is consistent, but CBT is not one simple, one size fits all approach. It changes for therapists and for patients.
CBT for Anxiety
Anxiety is sustained by two mechanisms that reinforce each other: catastrophic thinking, where the brain consistently overestimates threat and underestimates the ability to cope, and avoidance, where steering clear of feared situations prevents the brain from learning that feared outcomes either won’t happen or can be managed.
CBT for anxiety targets both. Cognitive restructuring challenges the accuracy of anxious thoughts — not through forced positivity, but through a systematic examination of evidence for and against them. Exposure work involves gradually approaching feared situations rather than avoiding them, teaching the nervous system through direct experience that the feared outcome is survivable. Together, they produce durable change rather than temporary symptom management.
For generalized anxiety disorder, the work tends to center on the worry process itself — the tendency to catastrophize, the difficulty tolerating uncertainty, and the mental habits that keep anxiety running in the background even when nothing specific is wrong. For social anxiety, the focus shifts to the beliefs driving fear of judgment and the avoidance patterns that reinforce them. For panic disorder, CBT specifically addresses the misinterpretation of physical sensations — the way the brain learns to read a racing heart or shortness of breath as signs of danger — and uses interoceptive exposure to correct that misreading.
CBT for Depression
Depression involves a different set of cognitive patterns than anxiety — less about threat and more about loss, failure, and worthlessness. The CBT model for depression identifies and challenges cognitive distortions: all-or-nothing thinking, overgeneralization, mental filtering that screens out positive information, and the tendency to personalize negative outcomes.
CBT for depression also addresses the behavioral dimension of the condition directly. Depression produces withdrawal and inactivity, and withdrawal and inactivity deepen depression — a cycle that behavioral activation interrupts by scheduling engagement with activities that provide a sense of mastery or pleasure, even when motivation is absent. The insight that action precedes motivation rather than following it is one of the more practically useful things CBT offers people with depression.
For major depressive disorder, CBT tends to be more structured and goal-oriented than in other presentations. For persistent depressive disorder — depression present for two or more years — the work often involves identifying the ways low mood has become embedded in identity and daily functioning, which requires more time and a different focus than episodic depression.
CBT for Trauma and PTSD
CBT for PTSD and trauma has its own specialized forms, the most researched of which are Trauma-Focused CBT and Cognitive Processing Therapy. Both work from the CBT model but adapt it specifically for the way trauma affects memory, belief, and the nervous system.
Trauma often produces what clinicians call stuck points — beliefs about the self, the world, or other people that formed in response to the traumatic experience and became fixed.
“It was my fault.”
“The world is completely unsafe.”
“I can’t trust anyone.”
Cognitive Processing Therapy works directly with these beliefs, helping clients examine them, trace where they came from, and replace them with more accurate and functional ones.
Unlike CBT for anxiety, trauma-focused CBT does not begin with exposure. The therapeutic relationship and a foundation of stabilization come first. Moving too quickly into traumatic material without adequate preparation can retraumatize rather than heal — which is why trauma treatment at Flourish Psychology follows a careful, staged approach, often combining CBT with EMDR or Brainspotting depending on what serves the individual client best.
CBT for OCD
OCD responds to a specific CBT protocol called Exposure and Response Prevention, or ERP. OCD operates through a cycle: an intrusive thought generates anxiety, a compulsion is performed to relieve that anxiety, and the relief reinforces the compulsion — teaching the brain that the compulsion is necessary for safety. ERP interrupts the cycle by exposing the person to the feared thought or situation without allowing the compulsive response, giving the brain the experience it needs to learn that the anxiety subsides on its own.
ERP requires a careful, gradual approach built on a hierarchy of feared situations, starting with lower-anxiety triggers and working toward more difficult ones. It also requires that the therapist has specific training in OCD treatment — standard CBT without the ERP component is significantly less effective for OCD than ERP-specific protocols. Not every CBT therapist is trained in ERP, and for someone with OCD, that distinction matters when choosing who to work with.
CBT for Eating Disorders
CBT for eating disorders — particularly for bulimia and binge eating disorder — is one of the most evidence-supported treatments available for these conditions. The CBT model identifies the specific thought patterns and behavioral cycles that maintain disordered eating: rigid dietary rules that set up restriction-binge cycles, the over-evaluation of shape and weight as a basis for self-worth, and the use of eating behaviors to manage emotional states.
Treatment typically involves regular food monitoring, behavioral experiments that challenge dietary rules, and cognitive work targeting the beliefs about body image and self-worth that drive the restriction. For anorexia, CBT is part of a broader treatment picture that addresses medical stability alongside the psychological work — the cognitive patterns in anorexia are particularly entrenched and require a longer, more carefully structured approach than other eating disorder presentations.
CBT for Perfectionism
Perfectionism has its own CBT framework, distinct from general anxiety protocols even though the two frequently co-occur. The CBT model for perfectionism identifies the core belief that self-worth depends on achievement and performance, the behavioral patterns that maintain it — checking, procrastination, excessive effort, avoidance of tasks where failure is possible — and the way those patterns worsen both performance and wellbeing over time.
Treatment involves behavioral experiments designed to test the beliefs driving perfectionism — deliberately doing something well enough rather than perfectly and observing what actually happens — alongside cognitive work targeting the all-or-nothing standards that make ordinary human error feel catastrophic. For high-achieving clients in demanding professional environments, this work often connects directly to career-related stress and the pressures of performing at a sustained high level in a city like New York.
CBT in Combination with Other Approaches
CBT rarely operates in isolation in skilled clinical practice. At Flourish Psychology, therapists draw from DBT, ACT, somatic therapy, and other modalities alongside CBT, combining approaches based on what the client’s specific presentation calls for. CBT provides an evidence-based cognitive and behavioral framework — other modalities address dimensions of experience that CBT alone doesn’t always reach, including the body, the therapeutic relationship, and material that doesn’t surface easily through structured cognitive work.
The right combination depends on the person, the condition, and how the work develops over time.
Flourish Psychology offers CBT and a full range of evidence-based treatments at their Brooklyn Heights office, with online therapy available throughout New York State. To get started, call 917-737-9475 or schedule an appointment online.
Parents of children with ADHD, learning disabilities, or other special needs are entitled to an appropriate public education under New York State law. If they are not about to find that appropriate education for a variety of reasons – despite IEPs, meetings, and years of advocacy – they may consider private school. Some private schools in NYC offer better support for parents and their children than public schools have available.
But private schools are expensive. What many New York families don’t know is that under certain circumstances, the answer to the cost question may be less impossible than it appears. Federal law and New York State law both provide pathways for families to seek reimbursement for private school tuition when public school has failed to provide an appropriate education.
The process is not simple, and it is not guaranteed — but for families who qualify, it exists.
What the Law Provides
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act — IDEA — is a federal law that requires public schools to provide every child with a disability a “Free Appropriate Public Education,” referred to in legal and educational contexts as a FAPE. That education must be designed around the child’s individual needs and delivered through an Individualized Education Program, or IEP.
When a public school fails to provide a FAPE, IDEA gives parents the right to seek private school placement at public expense. The legal standard, established through two landmark Supreme Court cases known as Burlington and Carter, requires families to demonstrate that the public school’s program was inappropriate and that the private school placement they chose provides the child with an appropriate education. The private school does not need to be state-approved to qualify.
New York State goes further than federal law. A 2007 state law established that children with disabilities have an individual right to special education services even in cases where they attend private school voluntarily — meaning the city may fund therapies, tutoring, and related services for private school students with disabilities even outside the reimbursement framework. The scope of what’s available depends significantly on the individual case and how it’s documented and pursued.
For families seeking full tuition reimbursement, the typical path runs through what’s known as a Due Process Hearing — a formal legal proceeding in which parents present evidence that the public school failed to provide FAPE. Families who cannot afford to front tuition costs while waiting for a hearing outcome can in some cases seek prospective funding, where the district pays directly rather than reimbursing after the fact.
This is a legal process, and navigating it effectively typically requires an attorney with experience in special education law. Flourish Psychology is a mental health practice, not a legal one — and the specifics of any family’s eligibility depend on factors that only a qualified attorney and the relevant documentation can assess.
Who This Applies To
The children most likely to be at the center of these cases are those whose needs the public school system has struggled to meet — children with ADHD, learning disabilities, processing disorders, autism spectrum conditions, anxiety disorders with educational impact, and other diagnoses that require more individualized support than a standard public school IEP typically provides.
In New York City specifically, the intersection of high demand, limited specialized placements, and a complex bureaucratic system means that many families with children who have genuine, documented needs find themselves in situations where the public school’s proposed program falls meaningfully short. The IEP meetings happen. The paperwork gets filed. The services look adequate on paper. And the child continues to struggle in ways that the school’s program isn’t addressing.
For children with ADHD in particular, the gap between what an IEP provides and what the child actually needs can be significant. ADHD affects not just attention but executive function, emotional regulation, self-esteem, and the ability to manage the social and academic demands of a school environment. A child who needs a smaller classroom, a higher staff-to-student ratio, specific therapeutic support, and a curriculum paced to how they actually learn is a child whose needs often exceed what a public school program delivers — even a well-intentioned one.
The Mental Health Cost of This Process
For the families going through it, the process of fighting for an appropriate education for a child with special needs carries a psychological weight that deserves direct acknowledgment.
The IEP process alone — the meetings, the negotiations, the documentation, the feeling of having to justify your child’s needs to a system that often pushes back — produces significant stress for parents. Many describe a state of chronic advocacy fatigue: the exhaustion of consistently having to fight for something that should be automatic, while simultaneously managing a child who is struggling and a household that is absorbing the strain of all of it.
Adding a Due Process Hearing to that picture — with attorneys, legal timelines, financial exposure, and the uncertainty of an outcome — compounds that stress substantially. Parents in this process frequently experience anxiety, depression, relationship strain, and a particular kind of grief for the uncomplicated childhood they wanted for their child and haven’t been able to provide.
The children themselves carry their own psychological weight through this period. A child who knows they learn differently, who has watched their parents fight on their behalf, who has experienced the disconnect between a school environment that doesn’t fit and a sense of their own potential, often arrives at a new school carrying low self-esteem, anxiety, and sometimes depression that developed during the years things weren’t working.
Once a private school placement is secured, the adjustment period carries its own demands. A new environment, new social dynamics, and the particular pressures of NYC private school culture all require attention alongside the academic support the placement was designed to provide.
How Therapy Fits Into This Picture
Therapy serves several distinct functions for families navigating this process.
For parents, individual therapy offers a space to process the chronic stress of advocacy, the grief and frustration of a system that hasn’t worked, and the impact of all of it on their relationship and their own mental health. Many parents in this situation have been running on adrenaline for years — attending meetings, researching options, consulting attorneys, managing their child’s day-to-day struggles — and haven’t had a place to put any of it down.
For children, therapy addresses the emotional and psychological residue of years in an environment that didn’t fit. Building self-esteem, processing the experience of struggling academically and socially, and developing the tools to manage ADHD in a new setting are all areas where a skilled therapist can make a meaningful difference — often running alongside the academic and therapeutic support the private school itself provides.
Flourish Psychology works with children, adolescents, and adults navigating exactly these challenges. Our Brooklyn office serves families throughout New York City and, through online therapy, across New York State.
A panic attack is one of the more frightening experiences a person can have — not because it’s dangerous, but because it doesn’t feel like it isn’t. The racing heart, the chest tightness, the shortness of breath, the dizziness, the absolute certainty that something is catastrophically wrong — all of it arrives without warning, often without any obvious trigger, and often in a matter of seconds. The body has launched into full emergency mode, and the mind is scrambling to make sense of it.
Most people who experience panic attacks eventually learn, through therapy or through time, that they aren’t medically dangerous. That knowledge helps — and for many people, it doesn’t fully stop the attacks. The body keeps doing the same thing regardless of what the mind now knows. That gap, between cognitive understanding and physiological response, is where somatic therapy — and Somatic Experiencing specifically — has something important to offer.
What’s Actually Happening During a Panic Attack
Panic attacks are nervous system events before they’re anything else. The sympathetic nervous system — the branch responsible for the fight-or-flight response — activates as if a genuine threat is present. Heart rate accelerates. Breathing becomes shallow. Blood flow redirects toward the muscles needed to respond to danger. The body is doing exactly what it was designed to do in a threatening situation.
The problem is that in panic disorder, this activation fires without a proportionate external threat. The nervous system has become sensitized — calibrated to detect danger at a lower threshold and to respond more intensely than the situation warrants. Once that sensitization is established, the physical sensations of the stress response themselves can become triggers. The slightly elevated heart rate noticed during ordinary exertion becomes evidence of danger, which produces more activation, which produces more physical sensations, which produces more alarm — a cycle that escalates quickly and is very difficult to interrupt once it’s running.
CBT addresses this cycle through the cognitive layer — identifying and challenging the catastrophic interpretations of physical sensations that keep the cycle running. This is genuinely effective for many people with panic disorder. For others, particularly those whose panic has roots in trauma or whose nervous system sensitization runs deep, the cognitive work reaches a limit. They understand the misinterpretation. The body keeps misinterpreting anyway.
Why the Body Needs Its Own Treatment
The nervous system learns through experience, not only through understanding. A person who intellectually knows that their racing heart is not a heart attack still has a nervous system that has learned to treat it as one — and that learning is encoded at a level below conscious thought. Changing it requires working at that level, not only above it.
Somatic Experiencing works directly with the physiology of the stress response. Developed by Dr. Peter Levine, the approach is based on the observation that traumatic and threatening experiences leave incomplete activation in the nervous system — mobilization that was never fully discharged. In the context of panic disorder, this incomplete activation keeps the nervous system in a state of readiness that makes future panic attacks more likely and more intense.
The work involves gently and gradually bringing attention to physical sensations — noticing what’s present in the body without amplifying it or catastrophizing it — and supporting the nervous system in completing the discharge cycle it has been holding. Over time, this reduces the baseline level of activation, restores the nervous system’s natural capacity to return to rest after stress, and changes the physical landscape in which panic attacks have been occurring.
How Somatic Experiencing Addresses the Panic Cycle Specifically
Several mechanisms make Somatic Experiencing particularly relevant to panic disorder.
The first is the development of interoceptive tolerance. One of the central features of panic disorder is the fear of bodily sensations — the experience of physical arousal as threatening rather than as ordinary information. Somatic Experiencing builds the capacity to notice and stay with physical sensations without immediately catastrophizing them. That shift in relationship to internal experience directly interrupts one of the primary maintaining mechanisms of panic.
The second is nervous system regulation. Somatic Experiencing works explicitly on the vagal regulation that governs the stress response — the parasympathetic nervous system’s capacity to bring activation back down after it rises. In people with panic disorder, this regulatory capacity is often compromised. The nervous system activates quickly and returns to baseline slowly, if at all. Building regulation through body-based work produces a physiological change rather than only a cognitive one.
The third is addressing trauma as a root cause. A significant number of people with panic disorder have a trauma history that sensitized the nervous system to begin with. The panic attacks are, in some sense, the body’s unfinished response to earlier threatening experiences. Somatic Experiencing addresses that stored activation directly — not by requiring detailed verbal recollection of what happened, but by working with the body’s held response to it.
What Treatment Looks Like
Somatic Experiencing for panic disorder doesn’t look like traditional talk therapy. Sessions involve tracking physical sensation in the body in the present moment — noticing what’s there, what shifts, what settles. The therapist guides attention toward the felt sense of experience rather than primarily toward narrative and interpretation.
A key principle is titration — working in small, manageable increments of activation rather than flooding the system with more than it can process. This is particularly important with panic disorder, where the fear of physical sensations can make any approach that intensifies bodily experience counterproductive. The work stays within what the nervous system can tolerate, which produces integration rather than overwhelm.
At Flourish Psychology, somatic therapy is one of several approaches available for anxiety and panic disorder, used alongside CBT, EMDR, and other evidence-based modalities depending on what each person’s presentation calls for. For clients whose panic has a strong physiological component, or whose cognitive work has reached a ceiling, body-based work often produces movement that talk-based approaches alone haven’t.
Panic disorder is treatable. For people who have tried approaches that work primarily through understanding and haven’t fully resolved the attacks, the missing piece is often at the body level. Flourish Psychology works with adults in Brooklyn and throughout New York City on panic disorder, anxiety, and trauma. Call 917-737-9475 or reach out through the contact page to schedule a session.
Location: 300 Cadman Plaza West Floor 12 - Brooklyn, NY 11201
Manage Consent
By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
